Last updated: January 2026 | Reading time: 8 minutes
Walking is often called the perfect exercise. It's free, requires no equipment, and almost anyone can do it. So why would you bounce on a mini trampoline instead?
It's a fair question. Both are low-impact. Both are accessible. Both can be done regularly without destroying your joints. But they're not interchangeable — each has distinct advantages depending on your goals.
Let's compare rebounding and walking across the metrics that actually matter.
Calorie Burn: The Numbers
This is usually the first question, so let's address it directly.
Walking (moderate pace, 3-4 mph):
- Burns approximately 280-320 calories per hour
- About 4-5 calories per minute
Rebounding (moderate intensity):
- Burns approximately 400-500 calories per hour
- About 7-8 calories per minute
The research:
A study by the American Council on Exercise found that rebounding at moderate intensity burns similar calories to running at 6 mph — but with significantly less perceived exertion. Participants felt like they were working less hard than the calorie burn suggested.
NASA research from the 1980s found rebounding to be 68% more efficient than treadmill running for cardiovascular conditioning.
The verdict: Rebounding burns roughly 40-50% more calories than walking at the same perceived effort level. If pure calorie burn is your goal, rebounding wins.
Time Efficiency
Most of us don't have unlimited time for exercise. How do these compare when time is limited?
To achieve equivalent cardiovascular benefit:
- 30 minutes of brisk walking ≈ 15-20 minutes of moderate rebounding
- 60 minutes of walking ≈ 30-40 minutes of rebounding
Why rebounding is more time-efficient:
- Higher intensity per minute
- Engages more muscle groups simultaneously
- Elevates heart rate more quickly
The practical reality:
If you have 20 minutes before work, rebounding will give you a more complete workout than walking the same duration. You can genuinely improve fitness with 10-15 minute rebound sessions.
Walking works brilliantly for longer sessions — a 60-minute walk is pleasant and sustainable. But if time is tight, rebounding delivers more per minute.
The verdict: Rebounding is approximately twice as time-efficient for cardiovascular conditioning.
Joint Impact
Both walking and rebounding are considered "low impact," but they're not equivalent.
Walking impact:
- Each step sends force equal to 1-1.5 times your body weight through your joints
- Impact is primarily through hips, knees, and ankles
- Hard surfaces (pavement, treadmills) increase impact
- Proper footwear helps but doesn't eliminate impact
Rebounding impact:
- The mat and suspension system absorb 80%+ of landing force
- Force is distributed more evenly across the body
- Joints experience compression rather than jarring
- NASA studies found rebounding puts significantly less stress on joints than running
For joint health:
Rebounding is genuinely gentler on joints than walking on hard surfaces. This matters particularly for:
- People with arthritis or joint pain
- Those recovering from injury
- Heavier individuals (more body weight = more impact)
- Older adults with osteoporosis concerns
Walking on grass or trails is gentler than pavement, but still higher impact than rebounding.
The verdict: Rebounding is lower impact. For joint-sensitive individuals, this advantage is significant.
Muscle Engagement
Walking primarily works:
- Quadriceps and hamstrings
- Calves
- Glutes (to a degree)
- Core (minimally, for stability)
Rebounding engages:
- All leg muscles (quads, hamstrings, calves, hip flexors)
- Core muscles (significant stabilisation required)
- Back muscles
- Arms and shoulders (with arm movements)
- Small stabilising muscles throughout the body
The difference:
Rebounding creates instability that your body must constantly correct. This engages stabilising muscles that walking on flat ground doesn't challenge. It's closer to walking on sand or an unstable surface — but sustained.
The up-down motion also works muscles through a fuller range than the forward motion of walking.
The verdict: Rebounding provides more comprehensive muscle engagement.
Bone Health
Both weight-bearing exercises support bone density, but through different mechanisms.
Walking benefits:
- Weight-bearing, which stimulates bone formation
- Regular impact signals bones to maintain strength
- Well-established research supporting bone health benefits
Rebounding benefits:
- Also weight-bearing
- The gravitational changes (acceleration and deceleration) may provide unique stimulus
- Some research suggests vibration-type forces improve bone density
- Less studied than walking but promising
The nuance:
Walking's bone benefits are thoroughly documented. Rebounding's benefits are supported but less extensively researched. Both are better than non-weight-bearing exercise (swimming, cycling) for bone health.
The verdict: Both support bone health. Walking has more research backing; rebounding likely offers similar or possibly enhanced benefits.
Balance and Coordination
Walking:
- Improves basic balance through regular practice
- Challenges balance more on uneven terrain
- Relatively automatic movement pattern for most adults
Rebounding:
- Constantly challenges balance and proprioception
- Requires active stabilisation throughout
- Engages vestibular system (inner ear balance)
- Shown to reduce fall risk in older adults
Why this matters:
Falls are a leading cause of injury in older adults. Exercise that improves balance and reaction time has real-world protective benefits.
Rebounding specifically trains the quick reflexive adjustments that prevent falls. Walking improves general mobility but doesn't challenge balance systems as intensely.
The verdict: Rebounding provides superior balance training.
Mental Health and Enjoyment
Exercise you don't do provides zero benefits. Enjoyment matters.
Walking advantages:
- Can be social (walking with friends)
- Gets you outdoors and into nature
- Allows for exploration and variety
- Can be combined with other activities (dog walking, commuting)
- Almost universally accessible
Rebounding advantages:
- Many people find bouncing inherently enjoyable
- Can be done while watching TV or listening to podcasts
- Weather-independent
- Music and rhythm enhance the experience
- Quick sessions feel more achievable
The psychology:
Walking tends to be pleasant but easily skipped. "I'll walk tomorrow" is one of the most common broken promises in fitness.
Rebounding, being quicker and more intense, creates a different psychological relationship. Ten minutes feels achievable. The endorphin release is faster. Many people find they actually look forward to bouncing.
The verdict: Depends entirely on personal preference. Both can be enjoyable; neither works if you don't do it.
Practical Considerations
Walking:
- Free (after footwear)
- Requires no equipment
- Weather-dependent (in the UK, significantly so)
- Requires suitable routes
- Easy to incorporate into daily life (commuting, errands)
Rebounding:
- Requires equipment purchase (£50-500 depending on quality)
- Requires some floor space
- Weather-independent
- Can be done any time
- Requires dedicated exercise time
The UK reality:
We get approximately 150 days of rain per year in the UK. That's a lot of days where outdoor walking requires significant motivation or waterproof gear.
Having a rebounder means weather is never an excuse. At 6am in January, bouncing in your living room is far more appealing than walking in the dark and drizzle.
The verdict: Walking is more accessible and free; rebounding is more weatherproof and convenient.
Can You Do Both?
Yes. In fact, combining walking and rebounding may be optimal.
A sensible approach:
- Daily: 10-15 minutes of rebounding for consistent cardiovascular maintenance
- When weather permits: Longer walks for mental health benefits and varied movement
- Time-pressed days: Rebounding only
- Social occasions: Walk with friends, family, or dogs
They're complementary rather than competing. Walking gives you fresh air, social connection, and exploration. Rebounding gives you efficient, joint-friendly, weather-proof cardio.
The Bottom Line
Choose rebounding if:
- You're time-poor and need efficient workouts
- Joint pain makes walking uncomfortable
- UK weather frequently stops you exercising
- You want to improve balance and core strength
- You prefer exercising at home
Choose walking if:
- You enjoy being outdoors regardless of weather
- Social exercise motivates you
- You have no budget for equipment
- You're already achieving fitness goals with walking
- You find bouncing uncomfortable or unenjoyable
Consider both if:
- You want the benefits of each
- Variety helps you stay consistent
- You're optimising for long-term health
Neither is objectively "better" — they serve different purposes and suit different people. But if you're looking for the most efficient, joint-friendly, weather-proof exercise for busy UK life, rebounding has compelling advantages that walking can't match.
The best exercise is the one you'll actually do. For many people, that turns out to be bouncing.
Related reading: